| From: | Michael Swierczek <mike(dot)swierczek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com" <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Sugrue, Sean" <Sean(dot)Sugrue(at)analog(dot)com>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Need help building SQL query |
| Date: | 2005-12-06 13:59:35 |
| Message-ID: | 68b5b5880512060559h6e1fc97cxe0021b89d8b9aecb@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Case in point, my uncle is an Oracle database administrator for a Lockheed
Martin site. When I mentioned PL/pgSQL, he was shocked - he had no idea
Postgres had a PL/SQL analog.
Unfortunately, he's too low down on the corporate food chain to push for a
migration.
On 12/5/05, operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com <operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> i think most folks use oracle b/c
>
> 1. that is what they are sold.
> 2. the next guy is using it.
> 3. the PHB(pointy haird boss)es don't know enough to
> ask their IT departments to evaluate if PGSQL could do
> the job.
> 4. some folks believe the FUD and think that if you
> don't pay for it, it must not work well.
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Charley Tiggs | 2005-12-06 15:42:11 | Re: SQL Statement Help Needed |
| Previous Message | Robert Blixt | 2005-12-06 07:03:59 | Re: Need help building SQL query |