Re: [HACKERS] Last call?

"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> _ HPUX 10.20

You can put down an X for both HPUX 9.03 and 10.20.

I discovered a number of minor problems when I tried to compile with
HP's cc instead of gcc like I usually do. I just committed fixes for
those.

I am still getting a discrepancy in the "rules" regression test,
namely a difference in the order in which tuples are returned:

*** expected/rules.out Fri Oct 2 12:28:01 1998
--- results/rules.out Sun Oct 25 19:31:42 1998
***************
*** 315,322 ****
pname |sysname
------+-------
bm |pluto
- jwieck|orion
jwieck|notjw
(3 rows)

QUERY: delete from rtest_system where sysname = 'orion';
--- 315,322 ----
pname |sysname
------+-------
bm |pluto
jwieck|notjw
+ jwieck|orion
(3 rows)

QUERY: delete from rtest_system where sysname = 'orion';

----------------------

This happens on all four permutations of HPUX version and compiler.
Are other people really seeing the tuple order given in the "expected"
file?

regards, tom lane