Re: response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs

From: "Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com>
To: "Pavel Rotek" <pavel(dot)rotek(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs
Date: 2008-02-25 11:10:32
Message-ID: 684362e10802250310m48c45cb3lad3e70312ef4b3b6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2008/2/25, Pavel Rotek <pavel(dot)rotek(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I have created functional index table(lower(href) varchar_pattern_ops)
> because of lower case "like" searching. When i ask the database directly
> from psql, it returns result in 0,5 ms, but when i put the same command via
> jdbc driver, it returns in 10 000 ms. Where can be the problem?? Any problem
> with PostgreSQL tuning??

Most likely the problem is that the JDBC driver uses prepared statements, in
which the query is planned withouth the concrete argument value. For like only
patterns that don't start with % or _ can use the index. Without the argument
value PostgreSQL can't tell whether that is the case, so it takes the safe
route and chooses a sequential scan.

to solve this particular problem, you have to convince jdbc to not use a
prepared statement for this particular query.

Markus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew 2008-02-25 13:11:04 Re: CORRECTION to msg 'loading same instance of dump to two different servers simultaneously'
Previous Message Pavel Rotek 2008-02-25 10:06:16 response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs