Re: plpython function problem workaround

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpython function problem workaround
Date: 2005-03-18 15:33:01
Message-ID: 6831.1111159981@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:35:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So that part of it can be solved fairly easily.

> Should I submit a patch? It should be only a few additional lines
> in PLy_procedure_munge_source(). Would you apply it only to HEAD,
> or would it be considered a bug fix that REL8_0_STABLE could get
> as well? It might be nice to have it in 8.0.2, whenever that comes
> out.

I think it would be reasonable to back-patch a small fix to convert CRLF.
The sort of rewrite Marco is considering, I wouldn't back-patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-18 15:38:24 Re: SMP scaling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-18 15:29:29 Re: pg_atributes index space question