Re: pg_upgrade vs. pg_dump

From: " Stéphane Wirtel" <stephane(at)wirtel(dot)be>
To: "Perry, Hemy" <hemy_perry(at)mentor(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade vs. pg_dump
Date: 2015-01-20 19:23:58
Message-ID: 67A7D71F-28F7-4280-9EFF-8A92169AF9A1@wirtel.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 20 Jan 2015, at 20:22, Perry, Hemy wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am planning a migration from 9.1.7 to 9.4.0.
> Based on my understanding, the recommendation is to use pg_upgrade
> over 'dump and restore'.
> Is that right?
You can compile the twice versions of PostgreSQL on the same computer
and just execute the upgrade with pg_upgrade and the right parameters.

>
> If I want to use pg_upgrade, I need to provide the -b bindir
> (--old-bindir=bindir) and so my second question is what if I'll
> provide 9.4 (the new PostgreSQL executable directory) also as the
> 'old-bindir', can it work that way? Always?
> [I am trying to solve a problem that I might not have the old-bindir
> available on the machine and only the new-bindir will be available (as
> well as the old & new datadir of course :)]
>
> Thanks
> Hemy

--
Stéphane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glyn Astill 2015-01-20 19:28:40 Re: cannot drop an extension
Previous Message Perry, Hemy 2015-01-20 19:22:07 pg_upgrade vs. pg_dump