Re: Operator family docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Operator family docs
Date: 2007-01-10 14:28:34
Message-ID: 6797.1168439314@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html
> states that
> "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14."
> which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit?

No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet. I'm planning to do
just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles...
In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference
pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-10 14:29:47 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-10 14:17:19 Re: pgsql: Change Windows rename and unlink substitutes so that they time