| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Operator family docs |
| Date: | 2007-01-10 14:30:18 |
| Message-ID: | 45A4F87A.8060609@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html
>> states that
>> "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14."
>> which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit?
>
> No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet. I'm planning to do
> just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles...
> In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference
> pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind).
OK, thanks.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-01-10 14:42:50 | Re: [PATCHES] fix build on Solaris 10/x86_64 in 64bit mode with Sun |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-10 14:29:47 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit |