Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql extension install nitpick
Date: 2011-07-03 23:05:44
Message-ID: 6655.1309734344@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Well, if I'm in the minority I'll yield gracefully. Anybody else have
>> an opinion?

> I don't see any harm in commenting it in both places.

OK, done.

I did not add comment commands to the "upgrade" scripts. We could do
that, but there's a risk of overwriting a previously user-supplied
comment, so on the whole I think it's better not to.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2011-07-03 23:12:48 flex on win64 - workaround for "flex: fatal internal error, exec failed"
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2011-07-03 22:01:23 non-superuser reserved connections? connection pools?