Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

As I read it, he is supportive of the community process that PG follows; I
am not so sure he promotes Postgres though :)

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Jason Long wrote:
> > Greg Smith wrote:
> > > I wonder if I'm the only one who just saved a copy of that post for
> > > reference in case it gets forcibly removed...
> > >
> > > Recently I was thinking about whether I had enough material to warrant
> > > a 2008 update to "Why PostgreSQL instead of MySQL"; who would have
> > > guessed that Monty would do most of the research I was considering for
> > > me?
> > >
> > > --
> > > * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore,
> MD
> > >
> > I quit using MySQL years ago when the default table type did not have
> > transactions and subqueries were not existent. The features I was
> > looking for were already in PostgreSQL for several versions.
> >
> > I am surprised to see such an honest post regarding MySQL.
>
> Monty is quite supportive of Postgres.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com

EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device