Re: BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner
Date: 2005-10-08 20:48:56
Message-ID: 654.1128804536@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The information schema currently follows SQL 1999. Interestingly, the
> requirement to "blank out" the column defaults of non-owned tables was
> apparently dropped in SQL 2003. Clearly, we need to review the
> information schema for SQL 2003 conformance.

Yeah. Not only that, but they changed the WHERE clause: where formerly
it restricted you to seeing tables you own, it now allows you to see
anything you have any granted privileges on. SQL99 reads

WHERE (C.TABLE_CATALOG, C.TABLE_SCHEMA, C.TABLE_NAME, C.COLUMN_NAME) IN
(SELECT TABLE_CATALOG, TABLE_SCHEMA, TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME
FROM DEFINITION_SCHEMA.COLUMN_PRIVILEGES
WHERE (SCHEMA_OWNER IN ( 'PUBLIC', CURRENT_USER )
OR
SCHEMA_OWNER IN ( SELECT ROLE_NAME FROM ENABLED_ROLES )))

but what I see in 2003 is

WHERE (C.TABLE_CATALOG, C.TABLE_SCHEMA, C.TABLE_NAME, C.COLUMN_NAME) IN
(SELECT CP.TABLE_CATALOG, CP.TABLE_SCHEMA, CP.TABLE_NAME, CP.COLUMN_NAME
FROM DEFINITION_SCHEMA.COLUMN_PRIVILEGES AS CP
WHERE (CP.GRANTEE IN ( 'PUBLIC', CURRENT_USER )
OR
CP.GRANTEE IN ( SELECT ROLE_NAME FROM ENABLED_ROLES )))

Probably there are similar changes in other views.

Not sure if there's time to do this for 8.1 ... I don't really have time
to grovel through it, do you?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-10-08 21:16:28 Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-08 20:33:10 Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function