Re: user meta (to the database, at least) information

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: user meta (to the database, at least) information
Date: 2001-02-20 21:08:10
Message-ID: 6514.982703290@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> writes:
> got a QA guy here who says "every other database I've worked with
> lets people add their own fields to the user tables, why can't you
> just do that".

Oh? News to me. How does he expect the system to fill the extra
fields?

> Is it safe to modify pg_shadow?

Strikes me as pretty risky, but you *might* get away with adding
more fields at the end with NULL defaults. Don't try to add indexes,
constraints, rules or triggers, as they won't work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-02-20 21:11:53 Re: INSERT INTO problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-20 21:04:58 Re: Re: A How-To: PostgreSQL from Tcl via ODBC