| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Martin A(dot) Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: problems with configure |
| Date: | 2000-11-06 16:28:03 |
| Message-ID: | 6506.973528083@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Martin A. Marques" <martin(at)math(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> writes:
>> Hmm ... is it possible that his compiler distinguishes between
>> "extern int foo(...)" and "extern foo(...)" ? Why don't we
>> have the return type there, anyway?
> If it's of any help, I'm on Solaris 7, SPARC, gcc-2.95.2, latest
> Postgres CVS. Another question would be, why didn't I have problems
> of this type when I compiled PostgreSQL 7.0.2 on Solaris 8, with the
> same version of gcc?
Different header files, likely. I'm starting to wonder if Solaris 7
has some header-file dependency for <sys/socket.h> beyond the one that
the test is allowing for (<sys/types.h>).
BTW, does 'Psocklen_t' equate to just 'socklen_t *', or is there
something strange hidden there?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-11-06 16:41:03 | Committed patches; initdb required |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2000-11-06 16:23:54 | Re: INTERVAL representation |