| From: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgre vs MySQL |
| Date: | 2008-03-14 14:50:50 |
| Message-ID: | 64CEB3F2-5450-4940-8FD6-79749E62E1C7@myemma.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mar 14, 2008, at 7:22 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> Still I'd be curious to know if people can scale pg to several
> hundreds(?) machines without loosing the features that differentiate
> it from other DB...
Jan Weick wrote Slony which was released by Affilias who runs the top-
level registries for the .info and .org domains (ref: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-12/msg01421.php)
. I'd imagine those are some pretty serious set-ups.
Erik Jones
DBA | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)
Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Jones | 2008-03-14 14:52:35 | Re: postgre vs MySQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 14:45:15 | Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly? |