Re: [HACKERS] union regression test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brook Milligan <brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] union regression test
Date: 1998-09-16 21:05:57
Message-ID: 6444.905979957@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Brook Milligan <brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu> writes:
> I have finally resolved the differences in the union regression test.
> The problem is that the test uses the float8 table as part of the
> test, and this table turns out to be different among platforms because
> of different behavior with small numbers. Since the float8 part of
> testing unions seemed entirely irrelevant I have changed it to use
> float4, which is not different among platforms.

It's not? I think you assume far too much about the uniformity of
floating-point hardware.

Is it necessary to use float data at all for union tests?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robson Miranda 1998-09-16 21:35:53 Transaction system (proposal for 6.5)
Previous Message Brook Milligan 1998-09-16 20:25:00 union regression test