Re: BUG #16119: pg_dump omits columns specification for matviews

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: dmitry(dot)telpt(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16119: pg_dump omits columns specification for matviews
Date: 2019-11-16 06:05:36
Message-ID: 6368.1573884336@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> We've faced up with an issue how pg_dump exports materialzed views, it
> doesn't export columns declaration that is legal parameter of CREATE DDL
> instruction.
> As I can see from db_dump source, it's intent behaviour and supposed that
> columns declarion will be picked up from query statement when matview is
> created by target instance. However, if matview is 'static' (doesn't have a
> query statement), it sets default column names (column1, column2, etc) that
> breaks all dependent tables/views/matviews, for instance:

> postgres=> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW test_mv
> (id, alias) AS
> VALUES (1, 5), (2, 6), (3, 17)
> ;

Hmm ... I agree this is not good, but this example doesn't seem like
a matview that anyone would create in practice. For curiosity's sake,
would you explain the actual use-case that you hit this in?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Koch 2019-11-16 07:40:27 Bug when creating domain from composite types
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-11-16 01:36:42 Re: BUG #16111: Unexpected query compilation error “negative bitmapset member not allowed”