Re: A new JDBC driver...

From: Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com>
To: Bryan Varner <bvarner(at)polarislabs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A new JDBC driver...
Date: 2013-03-12 18:55:18
Message-ID: 63342013-1740-4E17-A1D3-633CDEEB46C9@me.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Just to put this to bed, with regards to the project under discussion, the final delivery will be a single jar file with no external dependencies. Just haven't gotten that far yet.

On Mar 12, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Bryan Varner <bvarner(at)polarislabs(dot)com> wrote:

>>> I think using 3rd party dependencies is the proper way to go forward
>>> instead of reimplementing all required functionalities in every JDBC driver.
>>> That is not to say that the required dependencies should be kept to minimum.
>>
>> Two cents: it troubles me always when I hear this reasoning because the
>> external dependencies still increase the maintenance costs, no matter how
>> well managed. For instance, for JDBC/DB stuff, many people care (or are
>> mandated to care) about security and the associated maintenance.
>
> I could not agree more.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2013-03-12 18:59:21 Re: A new JDBC driver...
Previous Message Bryan Varner 2013-03-12 18:52:42 Re: A new JDBC driver...