Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable

From: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable
Date: 2011-03-25 17:53:04
Message-ID: 628264933.253522.1301075584595.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Making DDL serializable is *not* simple, and half-baked hacks won't
> make that situation better ...

That seemed unnecessary. Whether or not you approve of Stephen's solution, he is dealing with a real issue.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2011-03-25 18:01:48 Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-03-25 17:36:47 Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable