Re: 10.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 15:39:06
Message-ID: 6233.1463153946@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There is a long-running thread on pgsql-hackers on whether 9.6 should
> instead be called 10.0.

First I've seen it mentioned here.

I think you are just about exactly one week too late to bring this up.
Once we've shipped a beta, rebranding is way too confusing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • 10.0 at 2016-05-13 15:05:23 from Robert Haas

Responses

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-14 14:10:51 from Robert Haas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2016-05-13 15:39:33 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Thom Brown 2016-05-13 15:34:34 Re: 10.0