Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support
Date: 2007-04-11 22:56:50
Message-ID: 6221.1176332210@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> If we expose LET_OS_MANAGE_FILESIZE, should we add a flag to the
> control file so that you can't start a backend that has that defined
> against a cluster that was initialized without it?

I imagine we'd flag that as relsegsize = 0 or some such.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-04-11 23:49:37 Re: autovacuum multiworkers, patch 5
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-04-11 22:52:47 Re: Vista/IPv6

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-04-11 23:49:37 Re: autovacuum multiworkers, patch 5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-11 22:48:23 Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update