Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Åkerud <zilch(at)home(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Date: 2001-06-22 22:12:47
Message-ID: 6150.993247967@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Hmm. Anyone like the idea of a platform-specific default established
>> by configure? We could set it in the template file on platforms where
>> the default SHMMAX is too small to allow 1000 buffers.

> Template file seems like a good idea for platforms that can't handle the
> default. I don't think configure should be doing such tests because the
> target could be a different kernel.

Right, I wasn't thinking of an actual run-time test in configure, just
that we could use it to let the OS-specific template file override the
normal default.

We could offer a --with switch to manually choose the default, too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-22 22:22:48 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-22 22:06:38 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-22 22:22:48 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-22 22:06:38 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact