Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend
Date: 1998-08-06 01:37:35
Message-ID: 6143.902367455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> I've just run CVS UPDATE again, in another attempt to get initdb to run.
> Anyhow, I noticed that there was a message saying that there were
> conflicts. Any ideas?

That means CVS got confused about how to update your local file.
Typically, it means that the file now on your disk is broken ---
it will have both versions of the conflicting text. CVS is expecting
you to sort it out, which would be the right thing if the difference
involved a change that you needed to commit to the source tree.

If the conflict is in a file that you have not got interesting private
changes in, the best thing is just to delete the local copy of that file
and do cvs update again to fetch a clean copy.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-08-06 02:04:48 Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-08-05 22:08:32 WHERE xmin = 9999