| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CVS and the backend | 
| Date: | 1998-08-06 01:37:35 | 
| Message-ID: | 6143.902367455@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> I've just run CVS UPDATE again, in another attempt to get initdb to run.
> Anyhow, I noticed that there was a message saying that there were
> conflicts. Any ideas?
That means CVS got confused about how to update your local file.
Typically, it means that the file now on your disk is broken ---
it will have both versions of the conflicting text.  CVS is expecting
you to sort it out, which would be the right thing if the difference
involved a change that you needed to commit to the source tree.
If the conflict is in a file that you have not got interesting private
changes in, the best thing is just to delete the local copy of that file
and do cvs update again to fetch a clean copy.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-08-06 02:04:48 | Re: [HACKERS] SPI procedure for removing large objects | 
| Previous Message | David Hartwig | 1998-08-05 22:08:32 | WHERE xmin = 9999 |