Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade
Date: 2003-09-29 02:54:04
Message-ID: 60smmg2tkj.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> FWIW, FreeBSD just removed it (in the 5.x versions). Of course you can
>> still easily install it from ports.
>
> Interesting. Why would they remove it?

Because it's a REALLY BIG ball of mud to include as a core dependancy?

Don't get me wrong; I have several Emacs buffers presently open to
Perl programs; it's a _useful_ ball of mud. But big ball of mud it
certainly is, and it seems unremarkable that there would be some
reluctance to be dependent on it.

There's a LOT of stuff going on with Perl (Parrot + Perl6), and for
the FreeBSD folk to be reluctant to "contract" to all that change
seems unsurprising.
--
output = reverse("ofni.smrytrebil" "@" "enworbbc")
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-29 03:13:13 Re: PostgreSQL SSL communication with SecureTcpClient (Ssl
Previous Message Angel Todorov 2003-09-29 02:41:54 Re: PostgreSQL SSL communication with SecureTcpClient (Ssl v 3.0)