Re: slony question

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: slony question
Date: 2007-12-13 13:57:51
Message-ID: 60lk7y8zog.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com ("Scott Marlowe") writes:
> On Dec 10, 2007 2:19 PM, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
>> joshques(at)gmail(dot)com ("Josh Harrison") writes:
>> > Does slony support postgres major version upgrade ? ie., will it
>> > replicate between different major versions?
>>
>> Yes, that's one of the major "use cases" for Slony-I.
>>
>> Version 1.0 and 1.1 support (loosely) from PostgreSQL 7.3 to 8.1-ish.
>>
>> Version 1.2 dropped 7.3 support, but supports up to (just about;
>> there's a patch not in a 1.2 release that is needed for late-breaking
>> 8.3 changes) 8.3.
>
> Didn't 1.2 drop support for pg 7.4 as well? I thought I remembered
> reading that some time ago.

Well, that would mean that some of the testing I have been continuing
to do would be pretty useless ;-).

We still have one instance of 7.4 in production, where we'll want to
migrate to 8.something in the new year. It still seems nice to have
the option of possibly upgrading to new Slony-I before upgrading to
8.x, rather than being forced to do otherwise ;-).
--
output = reverse("ofni.sesabatadxunil" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxfinances.info/info/sgml.html
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MG 2007-12-13 14:00:22 autovacuum log?
Previous Message John D. Burger 2007-12-13 13:44:51 Re: Need LIMIT and ORDER BY for UPDATE