| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb |
| Date: | 2005-06-21 00:37:37 |
| Message-ID: | 609.1119314257@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> I don't see that much of a problem with having createdb etc. hardwire
>> postgres instead of template1 as the db-to-connect-to.
> OK, new patch posted to -patches that updates all the utilities as well.
I'm going to apply this this evening (ie, before any of the code drifts
under it) unless I hear squawks in the next hour or so, or find some
fatal problem while reviewing.
> The only change I didn't make was in line 3458 (in StartChildProcess) of
> postmaster.c - template1 seemed the more sensible option to leave there.
> Let me know if you disagree and I'll change it :-)
Will look at it. I'm sure there are a few references that *should* be
template1 ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-06-21 01:09:48 | Re: query plan ignoring check constraints |
| Previous Message | John Hansen | 2005-06-20 23:46:50 | Re: query plan ignoring check constraints |