Re: Trigger for Audit Table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bill Moseley <moseley(at)hank(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trigger for Audit Table
Date: 2007-03-10 01:40:05
Message-ID: 6047.1173490805@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bill Moseley <moseley(at)hank(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:50:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is not going to work because the row's not there yet.

> This is a BEFORE *UPDATE* trigger, not a BEFORE INSERT, so the row is
> there. The audit table is written when the primary record changes
> and the old version is written to the audit table, not the new
> version.

Well, if you want to write the old data, it's still a silly way to do
it: write the OLD.* tuple instead of forcing a fresh search of the
table.

> Ok, but as the id is a sequence. I need to test if NEW.id is set after
> the insert -- seems like not, IIRC, and I'd need to use curval().

You're confusing rules with triggers. In a trigger, NEW.* and OLD.*
are physical rows and you don't need to worry about multi evaluation
or anything like that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2007-03-10 02:00:12 Re: Setting week starting day
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2007-03-10 01:16:13 Re: Statistics