Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Date: 2010-02-25 19:40:14
Message-ID: 603c8f071002251140u49cd2bo64aa57b679ecb3a6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I have a TODO on fixing some of the typedef finding. But I can generate
>>> an up to date version of the list Bruce last used in a day or two, and then
>>> get this better whacked into shape for another run at the more traditional
>>> time.
>>
>> I am ready to run pgindent whenever requested.
> There is an updated typedefs list at
> <http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/typedefs.pl>

Bruce, you want to go ahead and do this? The sooner the better, AFAICS.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2010-02-25 20:09:53 Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-02-25 18:57:07 Re: Boolean partition constraint behaving strangely