Re: [PATCH] Output configuration status after ./configure run.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Priit Laes <plaes(at)plaes(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Output configuration status after ./configure run.
Date: 2010-02-10 19:01:57
Message-ID: 603c8f071002101101h7270d484x185f9e63be1a5af6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Priit Laes <plaes(at)plaes(dot)org> wrote:
>> Also, it's quite unclear which items deserve a place in the list.
>> If it's just to repeat what was in the configure command-line, what
>> is the value of that?
>
> It might avoid the 'FFFFUUUUUU, I forgot to enable python support.',
> after you have waited a while for the build to finish...

Hmm. That implies that you didn't look at the command that you typed
but you did look at its output. I'm not going to say "no one does
that" (who am I to judge?) but it seems kind of strange to me.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2010-02-10 19:08:50 I still didn't get how tsquery is internally
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-10 18:57:13 Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch