Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns
Date: 2010-02-01 19:29:17
Message-ID: 603c8f071002011129k262175b1g4cbc22e94115fedc@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Oh, one other thing.  Should we backpatch this, or just apply to HEAD?
>
> Just HEAD imo.  Without any complaints from the field, I don't think
> it's worth taking any risks for.  It's not like multiple inheritance
> is heavily used ...

OK, done.

...Robert

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-02-01 19:40:02
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Previous:From: James William PyeDate: 2010-02-01 19:18:02
Subject: Re: plpython3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group