Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns
Date: 2010-02-01 19:03:38
Message-ID: 13669.1265051018@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, one other thing. Should we backpatch this, or just apply to HEAD?

Just HEAD imo. Without any complaints from the field, I don't think
it's worth taking any risks for. It's not like multiple inheritance
is heavily used ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-02-01 19:13:50 Re: plpython3
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-02-01 19:01:32 Re: plpython3