From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 64-bit size pgbench |
Date: | 2010-01-29 16:20:54 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f071001290820h77ff0a65x458fa4d13994deee@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Was looking for general feedback on whether the way I've converted this
>> to use 64 bit integers for the account numbers seems appropriate, and to
>> see if there's any objection to fixing this in general given the
>> potential downsides.
>
> In the past we've rejected proposed patches for pgbench on the grounds
> that they would make results non-comparable to previous results.
Perhaps we need an option indicating whether or not the use of bigint
columns is OK.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2010-01-29 16:28:55 | Re: out-of-scope cursor errors |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-29 16:19:57 | Re: quoting psql varible as identifier |