Re: PG optimization question

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pierre Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nickolay <nitro(at)zhukcity(dot)ru>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG optimization question
Date: 2010-01-10 18:45:32
Message-ID: 603c8f071001101045wb99b337j3e1dabe9ead97421@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2010/1/10 Pierre Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>:
>
>> If you transfer (delete from staging, insert into archive) in one
>> transaction , then it will be always visible in exactly one of them,
>> and exatly once in a view over both staging and archive(s).
>
>        Does the latest version implement this :
>
> INSERT INTO archive (...) DELETE FROM staging WHERE ... RETURNING ...

No. There are no plans to support that, though there are proposals to support:

WITH x AS (DELETE FROM staging WHERE ... RETURNING ...) INSERT INTO
archive (...) SELECT ... FROM x

I'm not sure how much that will help though since, in the designs so
far discused, the tuples won't be pipelined.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-11 02:52:25 Re: Choice of bitmap scan over index scan
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-01-10 16:01:42 Re: Choice of bitmap scan over index scan