| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>, "vacuum(at)quantentunnel(dot)de" <vacuum(at)quantentunnel(dot)de>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "kedar(dot)potdar(at)gmail(dot)com" <kedar(dot)potdar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax |
| Date: | 2009-04-22 15:52:28 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070904220852g2272822cvc547735c50f88cc9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The KISS principle applies with a vengeance here. I think we should
> make the partitioning stuff handle only the simplest cases but do those
> well. Anybody who wants something more complex can still try to tackle
> it via the existing facilities.
+1.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-04-22 15:52:42 | Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-22 15:34:46 | Re: Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax |