| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 open items list |
| Date: | 2009-03-27 17:48:58 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070903271048r7843ff55m4147b6e94c95fb68@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> All,
>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we should also boot everything in the "pre-existing bugs"
>>> category,
>
> I don't agree. I think we should fix as many of those as we can without
> holding up the release. Having been (briefly) in charge of Another Open
> Source Database's bug list, I've seen where ignoring pre-existing bugs can
> lead, and it's not at all pretty.
I wish to recant my previous statement. I don't want to boot them - I
just don't want to hold up beta for them.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-27 18:06:28 | Re: 8.4 open items list |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-27 17:46:01 | Re: 8.4 open items list |