Re: array_agg and array_accum (patch)

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: array_agg and array_accum (patch)
Date: 2008-11-14 00:37:46
Message-ID: 603c8f070811131637n1c82422bv6737fcb7650f089b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> It seems that it would be an easy evening's work to implement unnest(),
> at least in the simple form
> function unnest(anyarray) returns setof anyelement
>
> without the WITH ORDINALITY syntax proposed by the SQL spec. Then
> we could eliminate intagg's C code altogether, and just write it
> as a couple of wrapper functions.
>
> Does anyone have an objection to doing that?

I think it would be great.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashish Kamra 2008-11-14 00:53:09 DirectFunctionCall3 and array_in
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-11-14 00:32:27 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard