Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulk operationsavoiding WAL
Date: 2007-03-09 16:47:53
Message-ID: 602.1173458873@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It strikes me that allowing archive_command to be changed on the fly
>> might not be such a good idea though, or at least it shouldn't be
>> possible to flip it from empty to nonempty during live operation.

> I'd rather fix it the proposed way than force a restart. ISTM wrong to
> have an availability feature cause downtime.

I don't think that people are very likely to need to turn archiving on
and off on-the-fly. Your proposed solution introduces a great deal of
complexity (and risk of future bugs-of-omission, to say nothing of race
conditions) to solve a non-problem. We have better things to be doing
with our development time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-03-09 16:48:49 Re: CLUSTER and MVCC
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-03-09 16:43:11 Re: CLUSTER and MVCC