| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore (libpq? parser?) bug in 8 |
| Date: | 2004-08-12 02:24:04 |
| Message-ID: | 6.1.1.1.0.20040812121941.048b2db8@203.8.195.10 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:15 PM 12/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>Why exactly does pg_restore need to parse the SQL anyway?
It just looks for complete statements. From memory it relates to the
possibility that TOC entries can have more than one statement, or it may
relate to handling COPY statements. I think it has to look for
PQresultStatus(...) == PGRES_COPY_IN for each statement it executes, so it
needs to pass statements one at a time.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2004-08-12 02:28:08 | Re: pg_restore (libpq? parser?) bug in 8 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-12 02:23:50 | Re: pg_dump 'die_on_errors' |