Re: Named transaction

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Named transaction
Date: 2009-06-17 16:37:46
Message-ID: 5EA8E073-8F2D-48E5-9077-307769B80364@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com> writes:
>> Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
>> ever, like Firebird?
>
> What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?

That Tom Lane, so warm and cuddly!

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-06-17 16:41:53 Re: Named transaction
Previous Message Guillaume Smet 2009-06-17 16:25:31 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema