Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date: 2009-07-24 18:50:16
Message-ID: 5C8DC9596945AA5571BFE525@teje
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Freitag, Juli 24, 2009 11:38:06 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> Bernd, are you done reviewing this or did you intend to do more?
> It's still marked as "needs review" on the commitfest page.

I hoped to get more profiling data like Andrew suggested, but haven't
enough time to do it :( The customer machine i can test on is not available
all the time, too. I haven't looked very detailed into the source, if you
plan to start a review of your own, feel free. I don't believe i can do
very much this weekend...

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-07-24 19:07:25 Multicore builds on MSVC
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-07-24 18:49:51 Re: When is a record NULL?