Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-01-21 17:35:41
Message-ID: 5C301999-51EF-4639-90BE-1886C3A6DFD5@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

> As far as I can see, there is absolutely zero reason to care about
> whether the product is called Postgres or PostgreSQL.

How about simply "Post"? Or just "SQL"? ;-P

> If it were
> called WeGrindUpTheBonesOfSmallChildrenSQL, maybe a change would be
> worth considering.

And where do you think baby powder comes from? Sheesh.

> As it is, I submit that the product name is not on
> in the top 10,000 things we should be worried about fixing, even if
> there were a consensus that it were a good idea (which there isn't)
> and even if -core had not already made a decision on this point (which
> they have). What I think we SHOULD be worrying about right now is
> getting 9.0 out the door, and I am 100% opposed to letting ourselves
> getting sucked into this or any other discussion which is likely to
> make that take longer than it likely already will.

+1

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2010-01-21 19:00:12 Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-21 17:19:42 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-01-21 17:42:58 Re: GUC failure on exception
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-21 17:33:35 Re: quoting psql varible as identifier