Re: Extensions User Design

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design
Date: 2009-06-24 21:56:21
Message-ID: 5B0A9798-6847-459C-A28D-ED258BEC8EA4@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I agree they have too many. I think moving to none would be a
> mistake, though. Would they even drop things like Dynaloader or
> ExtUtils::MakeMaker? That would be crazy, IMNSHO. I think there's a
> sweet spot here and we are not very far away from it in the number
> of things we currently ship.

They want to drop everything except for tools to download, build,
test, and install other modules. That's the limitation.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-06-24 22:09:17 Re: Extensions User Design
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-06-24 21:41:03 Re: Extensions User Design