Re: No checksums please

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Tuesday, February 06, 2007 16:49:28 +0000 Greg Sabino Mullane
<greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
>> I don't know if there is a difference between "duplicate detection" and
>> "partial duplicate detection". AFAIK, only the "partial duplicate
>> detection" has caused problems. But just ignore that ocmment if they are
>> the same thing.
>
> Most of the moderated posts in the queue (e.g. -announce) seem to have
> all three types of checksums:
>
> Duplicate Message-ID
> Duplicate Message Checksum
> Duplicate Partial Message Checksum
>
> It's fairly frustrating - for example, the recent post from Pavel Golub
> was approved by me this morning, and a few minutes later there were
> five separate messages in the queue with this message and all three
> duplicate warnings on each of them. I've left them in there in case
> others want to take a look.

I put a check on Duplicate Message-ID in place, but left the checksum stuff
turned off ... that should reduce the duplicates in the queue, but still allow
stuff like the posts to slave-to-the-web through ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFyk8t4QvfyHIvDvMRAteoAJ0bgyTfW2IJtW4eNwSMBJwOCLf6uwCgq3rz
NSlt2n4Cjeu6zpp2UcCQobo=
=ULUd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----