one table being used for two purposes with foreign key for each?

From: Miles Keaton <mileskeaton(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: one table being used for two purposes with foreign key for each?
Date: 2005-01-02 10:05:18
Message-ID: 59b2d39b050102020525847461@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

What if, like Amazon, a customer can have more than one address on
file? Then you make "addresses" a separate table with one-to-many
relationship.

So then you're making affiliates (or clients, or distributors) and you
realize it would be nice to re-use the fields you already have there
in the "addresses" table, even though the affiliate's address is
one-to-one, NOT a one-to-many.

Would it be bad design to have different foreign keys, as shown below?
Is this a bad idea?

Should I just re-type the address field definitions directly into the
affiliates table, since it's not one-to-many?

create table customers (
id serial primary key,
name varchar(64)
);

create table affiliates (
id serial primary key,
name varchar(64)
);

create table addresses (
id serial primary key,
customer_id int REFERENCES customers(id),
affiliate_id int REFERENCES affiliates(id),
addr1 varchar(64),
addr2 varchar(64),
city varchar(64),
state varchar(12),
postalcode varchar(12),
country char(62),
CONSTRAINT needs_link CHECK (customer_id IS NOT NULL OR affiliate_id
IS NOT NULL)
);

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2005-01-02 16:19:23 Re: Formatting an Interval
Previous Message TJ O'Donnell 2005-01-01 19:20:36 Re: Function in C++