| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Manuel Sugawara" <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto |
| Date: | 2007-11-10 00:02:17 |
| Message-ID: | 5993.1194652937@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/10/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> OK, first question. How would someone have the 8.0 signatures in 8.2?
>> Don't they reinstall pgcrypto for every major release?
> Why reinstall if the functions come from dump?
> At least in skype we stumbled on the problem. But if the reinstall
> is widespread practice, then indeed it may not be worth bothering.
If you don't re-run a contrib module's sql script then you don't get any
new functions that may have been added to the module. So I think the
real issue here is that we ought to deprecate the idea of skipping that
step, period.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-10 00:07:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Is "query" a reserved word in 8.3 plpgsql? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-11-10 00:00:38 | Re: last note to rewrite function |