Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Date: 2009-03-22 21:27:04
Message-ID: 59768F7C-0B14-4E3B-BF36-D45D1C20C8D8@hi-media.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Le 22 mars 09 à 22:05, Tom Lane a écrit :
> This seems drastically overengineered.  What do we need two levels of
> objects for?

We need to be able to refer (pg_depend) to (system level) modules.
Any given extension may depend on more than one module.

What did I overlook?
-- 
dim




In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-22 21:46:20
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-03-22 21:15:27
Subject: Re: typedefs for indent

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group