| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues |
| Date: | 2009-03-22 21:05:01 |
| Message-ID: | 17539.1237755901@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> He also worked out some OS level tools for module handling, but I
> think I'd prefer to have another notion in between, the extension.
> The extension would be a new SQL object referring to zero, one or more
> modules and one or more SQL scripts creating new SQL objects (schemas,
> tables, views, tablespaces, functions, types, casts, operator classes
> and families, etc, whatever SQL scripting we support now --- yes,
> index am would be great too).
This seems drastically overengineered. What do we need two levels of
objects for?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-03-22 21:15:27 | Re: typedefs for indent |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-22 20:27:42 | Re: typedefs for indent |