Re: Need a better name for MinMax indexes

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need a better name for MinMax indexes
Date: 2014-06-17 21:43:28
Message-ID: 57B621D0-9E11-4977-8052-CF421019F0DB@excoventures.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Jun 17, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> One of the features for 9.5 will likely be "minmax" indexes, which are
> indexes which index only the upper and lower bounds of each data page,
> making for a very compact index ... like 100MB for a 100GB table.
>
> The working name for these are "minmax" indexes which is not very
> compelling and unlikely to reach users for how cool and useful they are.
> Suggestions on an alternate name?

At the risk of sounding trite and clichéd: "big data index" or "big table index" - after all, it is an index that you want to use on a big table.

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-06-18 01:17:32 Re: Need a better name for MinMax indexes
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-06-17 21:36:56 Need a better name for MinMax indexes