Re: A configure.in patch check (fwd)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A configure.in patch check (fwd)
Date: 2002-08-25 14:55:02
Message-ID: 5744.1030287302@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for default superuser reserved number of connections])
> + PGAC_ARG_REQ(with, reservedbackends, [ --with-reservedbackends=N set default superuser reserved number of connections [2]],
> + [],
> + [with_reservedbackends=2])

This will be rejected anyway; what you want is to set up
reserved_backends as a GUC parameter, not as something that has to be
hard-wired at configure time. I can't see any reason to make it
hard-wired...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-25 14:57:12 Re: Are "text" strings 0 terminated internally?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-08-25 14:34:29 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 7.2.2: Security Release