Re: When should be advocate external projects?

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Date: 2016-05-13 05:31:34
Message-ID: 573566B6.2000106@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 05/12/2016 08:28 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
>
> What discussions/expectations have there been (on or off list) about
> the possibility of pglogical being accepted into core?

The expectation is that it will be in core in the next major version,
barring an unexpected halt to development.

That's the reason why I was in favor of doing a "please test this" in
the announcement. However, we ran out of time for discussion of that,
and omitting it was the default choice without consensus.

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-05-13 05:46:38 Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Previous Message Shane Ambler 2016-05-13 03:28:59 Re: When should be advocate external projects?