From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Date: | 2016-04-08 12:49:16 |
Message-ID: | 5707A8CC.6080206@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/07/2016 02:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So recovery is conflicting here. My guess is that this patch is
> missing some lock cleanup.
>
> With the test case attached in my case the COMMIT PREPARED record does
> not even get replayed.
>
Should we create an entry for the open item list [0] for this, due to
the replication lag [1] ?
CommitFest entry [2]
Original commit [3]
Cc'ed RMT.
[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.6_Open_Items
[1]
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E7497864-DE11-4099-83F5-89FB97AF5073@postgrespro.ru
[2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/523/
[3]
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=978b2f65aa1262eb4ecbf8b3785cb1b9cf4db78e
Best regards,
Jesper
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-08 12:58:57 | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2016-04-08 12:45:49 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |