Re: eXtensible Transaction Manager API (v2)

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: eXtensible Transaction Manager API (v2)
Date: 2016-03-11 19:04:07
Message-ID: 56E316A7.1070706@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/11/16 2:00 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:11 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

> I'm concerned about the lack of response or reviewers for this patch.
> It may be because everyone believes they had their say on the original
> thread, or because it seems like a big change to go into the last CF, or
> for other reasons altogether.
>
>
> We'll prepare easy setup to play with our solutions, so any developers
> could see how it works. Hope this weekend we'll post something about this.

OK, then for now I'm marking this "waiting for author." You can switch
it back to "needs review" once you have posted additional material.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2016-03-11 19:10:14 Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-03-11 19:00:47 Re: eXtensible Transaction Manager API (v2)